Millionaire claimed wife lured him with sex

Here we go, another woman bashing headline from the Telegraph but what makes it really bad – it’s true!

Guess what, an older guy marries a much younger lap dancer he met in a ‘club’. The couple lived together for seven years before marrying in 2005 — they separated in 2007 and the wife has since been living in a rented house on a wage of $411 a week. 

The guy said he was "emotionally or pathologically dependent" on her when they discussed marriage years later and she used this to make him agree to give her $3.25 million in a pre-nuptial agreement. The bloody pre-nup was his idea according to the court documentation so suck it up sunshine! I am quite sure if he can afford $3.25 million that was mentioned in the agreement he is not short of a penny.

This Woman lived with this man for 9 years and it appears that it has taken 5 years to get to court due to I’m sure his legal team while he lives his comfortable life and she on $411 per week; 5years, 3.25 million invested, even at bank rates it’s close to $1million he has made while it’s been dragged out – more I’m sure than the cost of protracting the legal process.

This Man also claimed the quality and quantity of their "intimate relations" declined after they married and he believed she did not love him or want to have children with him.

The Judge ruled that the husband failed to prove he had been coerced into the pre-nup, and the idea of having the contract had been his. 

The Judge said the wife's claim that she loved her husband and the sex did not change much after marriage was more believable. 

The judge also found the businessman tried to demean his wife and her work as a lap-dancer during the court hearing. 

This was the second divorce for the businessman, the first one costing “him” $7 million.

The cost of divorce is far more than the money involved and if the reported case is anything to go by the first wife would have also has a struggle on her hands. There is no accounting for this woman’s anguish, emotional upheaval and fighting him for an amount he had willingly agreed to before they were married. This lady is now 44years old so I think her previous profession might be out of the realms of possibility and if she had no other skills it would have been difficult for her to find work now.

I am now going to refer back to my last post about the new CEO of Google and the uproar that has been caused by her only taking 2 weeks maternity leave. We can’t win can we and guess what most of the ‘baggers’ are women.

If, like the lady above our marriage fails and we don’t have a career in progress we are in trouble, if we have a career and choose to continue this while we have our family we are criticised but if her situation changed by choice or other she would be in a much better situation to keep the status quo while dealing with the emotional issues.

Let everyone make their own choices and the rest should be supportive whatever they may be. Be forever thankful we have the ability to make choices as others around the world are not so lucky!